Home | NAAC

 Criterion 2 - Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350)

Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)	Relevant Proofs
2.1.1	Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years) 2.1.1.1. Number  of students admitted year wise during last five years 2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years	2.1.1
2.1.2	Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years  ( exclusive of supernumerary seats)   2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years	2.1.2 Average Percentage of seats filled against
Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (50)	Relevant Proofs
2.2.1	The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes/ have policies in place for different levels of learners	2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students
2.2.2.	Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)	2.2.2 Student full time teacher ratio
Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching-Learning Process (50)	Relevant Proofs
2.3.1	Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning peer learning, team teaching, case law method  and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences	2.3.1 Student centric methods such as experiential learning
2.3.2	Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process.	2.3.2 Teachers use of ICT enabled tools for effective teaching
2.3.3	Ratio of faculty mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic  year	2.3.3 Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues
2.3.4	Ratio of Student to students mentoring for academic and other related issues   (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic  year)   2.3.4.1: Number of Student mentors/teaching assistant identified for student to student mentoring	2.3.4 Ratio of student to students mentoring for academic and other related issues
Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60)	Relevant Proofs
2.4.1	Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years	2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during last five years
2.4.2	Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / LL.D during the last five years  (consider only highest degree for count) 2.4.2.1: Number of full time teachers with Ph.D./LL.D year-wise during the last five years	2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with PHD During last five years
2.4.3	Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years)	2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers
2.4.4	Measures taken by the institution for faculty retention	2.4.4 Measures taken by the institution for faculty retention
Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30)	Relevant Proofs
2.5.1	Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency , mode and innovation introduced in the internal evaluation	2.5.1 Mechanism of IA is transparent and robust alterna
2.5.2	Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient	2.5.2 Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent
Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (60)	Relevant Proofs
2.6.1	Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.	2.6.1 Teachers and students are aware of the stated programme and course outcomes of the programmes offered
2.6.2	Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.	2.6.2 Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution
2.6.3	Average pass percentage of Students during last five years  2.6.3.1: Total number of final year students who passed the examination conducted by Institution 2.6.3.2: Total number of final year students who appeared for the examination conducted by Institution	2.6.3 Average pass percentage of students during last 5 yeras
Metric No.	Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)	Relevant Proofs
2.7.1	Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. (online survey to be conducted )